Joe Biden ‘ignored advice’ on Afghanistan says James Marlow
We use your sign-up to provide content in ways you’ve consented to and to improve our understanding of you. This may include adverts from us and 3rd parties based on our understanding. You can unsubscribe at any time. More info
EU efforts to create a rapid reaction force have been paralysed for more than a decade despite the creation in 2007 of a system of battlegroups of 1,500 troops that have never been used due to disputes over funding and a reluctance to deploy. But the exit of US-led troops from Afghanistan has brought the subject back into the spotlight with the EU alone potentially unable to evacuate personnel from countries where it is training foreign troops, such as in Mali.
Germany called on the European Union on Thursday to enable coalitions of the willing within the bloc to rapidly deploy a military force in a crisis.
And EU foreign policy chief Josep Borrell urged the bloc to create a rapidly deployable “first entry force” of 5,000 troops to reduce dependency on the United States.
He said: “Sometimes there are events that catalyse history, that create a breakthrough, and I think that Afghanistan is one of these cases.”
He added that he hoped for a plan in October or November.
“It represents a warning for the Europeans, they need to wake (up) and to take their own responsibilities,” he said after chairing a meeting of EU defence ministers in Slovenia.
Emmanuel Macron also put into question the bloc’s military alliance with the US within NATO whilst admitting the EU is “too weak” militarily as it stands today.
He said: “As I have done at every point in front of the French people, I would today like to say with resolute conviction: the Europe of today is too weak, too slow, too inefficient.
“But Europe alone can enable us to take action in the world, in the face of the big contemporary challenges.”
The comments infuriated a NATO official who told Politico it was “dishonourable” for France o mount an attack on the coalition.
Referring to the US and the UK, they said: “If France’s assessment is that Europe is too weak, how can the solution be to make it weaker by dividing it internally and cut it off from the biggest two other defence spenders.
“We have only one set of forces. Parallel structures will only weaken the existing pool.”
Diplomats in the EU defence meeting told Reuters there was no decision on the way ahead, with the EU unable to agree on how it would quickly decide to authorise a mission without involving all 27 states, their national parliaments and those wanting United Nations approval.
Asked to comment on the German call, US State Department spokesman Ned Price said “a stronger, more capable Europe is in our shared interests” and that Washington strongly supported enhanced cooperation between the European Union and the US-led NATO military alliance.
“NATO and the EU must forge stronger and institutional links and leverage each institution’s unique capabilities and strengths to avoid duplication and potential waste of scarce resources,” he told a regular news briefing.
Macron on brink as French turn against President over pandemic [DATA]
Joe Biden labelled a ‘clear and present danger’ amid impeachment bid [INSIGHT]
Joe Biden LIVE: Cover-up mystery as POTUS crisis call faces ‘blackout’ [LIVE BLOG]
The proposal from Germany, one of the strongest military powers in the EU but historically reluctant to send its forces into combat, would rely on a joint decision by the bloc but not necessarily all members deploying their forces.
“In the EU, coalitions of the willing could act after a joint decision of all,” German Defence Minister Annegret Kramp-Karrenbauer said in a tweet.
A rapid reaction force is seen as more likely now that Britain has exited the bloc. Britain, one of Europe’s main military powers alongside France, had been sceptical of collective defence policy.
EU diplomats say they want a final deal on design and funding by March. France takes over the six-month EU presidency from Slovenia in January.
Kramp-Karrenbauer said the key question was not whether the EU would establish a new military unit, and the discussion must not stop there.
“The military capabilities in EU member countries do exist,” she said. “The key question for the future of the European security and defence policy is how we finally use our military capabilities together.”
Slovenian Defence Minister Matej Tonin suggested that a rapid reaction force could comprise 5,000 to 20,000 troops but deployment should not depend on a unanimous decision by the EU’s 27 states.
“If we are talking about the European battlegroups, the problem is that, because of the consensus, they are almost never activated,” he told reporters.
“Maybe the solution is that we invent a mechanism where the classic majority will be enough and those who are willing will be able to go (ahead).”
Source: Read Full Article